Scientific Editing

Brought to you by

Scientific Editing

Get expert in-depth editing and strategic advice on your manuscript, review article or grant proposal from a team of editors following the quality standards set by Nature Research. Scientific Editing includes a Gold English language edit, a developmental edit, a quality assurance edit and a summary report. We specialize in research papers, reviews and grant proposals within the natural sciences (medicine, biology, chemistry, physics and earth sciences) and engineering.

A Team-based Assessment of Your Manuscript’s Needs

A Scientific Consultation Among our Team of PhDs A team of PhD-qualified editors with experience in your field carefully assess your manuscript and any accompanying information and then meet to

Identify priority issues in the manuscript
Discuss how the Scientific Editing team can address those priorities

A Thorough Developmental Edit

A Substantive In-Depth Assessment of Your Scientific Manuscript Based on the priorities identified in the team meeting, experienced members of the Scientific Editing team examine the text in significant detail and provide the following:

Strategic developmental edits that will improve the structure and clarity of the logical argumentation, such as how well the implications of the work are highlighted
Incisive comments recommending further author revisions that will help you maximize your manuscript’s effectiveness.
Improved English grammar to ensure that your ideas are conveyed clearly

A Thorough Strategic Report

Customized to the Needs of Each Scientific Manuscript Scientific Editing also includes a custom 3-6 page report that includes:

Explanations of the prioritized issues identified in your paper, how we addressed them and/or how you might be able to address them further.
Insights into how readers, peer reviewers, and journal editors might view your paper
Strategic advice for improving your writing in the future.
Comments about additional documents provided for editing, such as cover letters or responses to reviewers.

Continued Support after Scientific Editing

Trusted by Researchers and Universities to Help their Science Stand Out

After you have received Scientific Editing and have considered the advice and made changes, we provide one free language edit (for field-specific grammar, phrasing, and punctuation correction) within 6 months of the completion of the initial order.
You may also want to purchase Figure Formatting or Manuscript Formatting at this time; from our partners, AJE

Download one of our sample files to see the types of suggestions and edits made by our Scientific Editors

Scientific Editing Sample Edit (.DOCX)

Scientific Editing Sample Report (.DOCX)

Order Scientific Editing starting at $1500

Confidentiality Assured

We never show your paper to anyone so you can be confident that when you submit to a journal, the editor's decision will be independent and fair

Read our ethics policies

Our Quality Guarantee

To ensure that the changes you make based on the editor’s report are grammatically correct, we include one free language re-edit of your revised paper before you submit to the journal (for Scientific Editing only). To claim this free re-edit, email support within 6 months of your original order and attach your revised paper. After this free re-edit, we guarantee that if your language-edited paper is rejected by a journal because of the English alone, we will re-edit your paper once for free.

Where our Customers Publish

Advanced Functional Materials
Cancer Research
Developmental Cell
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Energy and Environmental Science
Genome Biology
Geophysical Research Letters
Immunity
Journal of Experimental Medicine
Nano Letters
Nature
Nature Climate Change
Nature Communications
Nature Genetics
Nature Geoscience
Nature Medicine
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States
Science
Science Advances

Testimonials

I would like to express my sincere appreciation for your work. You did really an excellent job. What I liked in particular was that you gave comments with substantial suggestions how to improve. Although I have published till now quite a number of scientific papers (>300) and many of them in high impact journals I learned a lot throughout this. I Iook forward to future cooperation of mutual benefit.

Full Professor · University of Bayreuth · Germany

The report with the feedback summarizing edits and comments is very informative. We appreciate a lot your editor’s work, with changes tracked and comments on the text improving clearly our manuscript. Finally, your recommendations concerning the most appropriate journal for publication will decidedly help us for the next submission of our manuscript.

Research Director, CNRS/Team Leader · Sorbonne University · France

These policies relate specifically to Nature Research Editing Service. Please see also our Terms of Service for other core principles, for example regarding the confidentiality of your documents.

Our aim is to serve the interests of authors and institutions, not the editorial and publishing interests of Springer Nature journals.

We openly and clearly declare to potential and current customers that we are part of Springer Nature, and we inform potential customers about our independence from the publishing process.
We aim to be publisher-neutral in our editing and advice, and especially in our journal recommendations (where applicable). We take steps during the editing process, when giving advice, and when recruiting and training editors to help us achieve this aim.
Nature Research Editing Service does not measure its success in terms of the publication of edited documents by Springer Nature journals.

We do not involve ourselves in the publishing process.

We do not guarantee publication of papers or funding of grant applications. We expect journal editors and grant review panels will make these decisions entirely independently of Nature Research Editing Service and other author services providers.
Draft journal articles and their scientific content are not shared with professional editors who make decisions on research papers at Springer Nature journals.
Any comments that we make regarding the suitability of specific target journals are explicitly presented as opinion and not as a definitive prediction of the outcome of submission.
If an author indicates that they mainly want to know whether or not their paper is acceptable to a specific Springer Nature journal, or has any other query for which a Springer Nature journal editor is the most appropriate contact, we will suggest that the author contacts the journal directly.
We do not suggest peer reviewers.

We do not infringe on authorship.

When editing documents, wherever possible, we provide our edits and comments in an easily reviewable format. We encourage authors to review our input critically, rather than accepting all of our edits and suggestions without review.
We never confirm that any document is ready for submission, submit anything to a journal or funding body, or correspond with journal editors or peer reviewers on behalf of authors.
We do not ghostwrite or completely rewrite large passages of text, and we do not directly introduce ideas that are not already present in the documents submitted to us. Our editing focuses on improving how the existing research is communicated.

General policies

We do not engage in or encourage practices that contravene relevant ethical guidelines.
For Scientific Editing, if we suspect unethical practice in a submitted document or correspondence, we will point it out and explain it. If we suspect severe infringement of ethical requirements or laws (particularly unacceptable harm to humans or animals), we act on this where possible.
We review these policies on a regular basis and keep up-to-date with issues arising in the publication ethics landscape.
We train editors to follow these policies, we monitor adherence to these policies, and we take action in the event of any failure to follow them.

Scientific Editing

Scientific Editing